Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] vs Vlad Andrei Dancu [886th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W L W L
Form
W L L L L L L L W LHead-2-Head: Zandschulp 2 - 0 Dancu
They have played 4 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Dancu winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Dancu was at the M25 Doboj, 16-05-2019, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 2 |
| Vlad Andrei Dancu | 0 |
| Zandschulp | Stats | Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (9-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 89 | Ranking | 886 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 503 |
| 29 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 62% (362-226) | Career Total W/L | 57% (190-141) |
| $3,420,360 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zandschulp VS Dancu H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Dancu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 11 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:15:0 | Average Match Time | 1:15:0 |
| 64% (63/99) | 1st Serve % | 51% (67/132) |
| 79% (50/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (33/67) |
| 67% (24/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (39/65) |
| 37% (7/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (60/132) | Return Points Win % | 25% (25/99) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 2 - 0 Dancu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 43.6% of points on their second serve, while Dancu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dancu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.55% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 51.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dancu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 50.72% of matches played (W/L 35/ 34), with Dancu winning 37.04% (W/L 10/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Dancu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 180/ 126), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 12/ 16), where as Dancu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 7/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zandschulp winning 2 times and Dancu being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Dancu winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Dancu was at the M25 Doboj, 16-05-2019, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Dancu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Dancu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Dancu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 153.12 while Dancu has played against players with an average rank of 134.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dancu has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 30.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dancu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Best Odds For The Match
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vlad Andrei Dancu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Theodor-Matei Ene
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
1-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
6-0 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
108
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Puskar
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
49%
(
51 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
113
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Pennaforti
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
57%
(
59 of
103)
1st Serve %
50%
(
56 of
113)
10
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
45 of
56)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Stefan Palosi
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(4) 6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Zandschulp vs Dancu?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zandschulp Vs Dancu is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (362/226) | Win/Loss | 57% (190/141) |
| 58% (824/589) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (421/357) |
| 53% (7081/6262) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3862/3603) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2868 | Aces Total | 753 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2129 | Total Double Faults | 560 |
| 1:35:21 | Average Match Time | 1:23:36 |
| 178.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 178.75 |
| 62% (23889/38801) | 1st Serve % | 55% (9920/17922) |
| 71% (17067/23889) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6524/9920) |
| 48% (7187/14915) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3940/8010) |
| 43% (1769/4107) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (779/1759) |
| 41% (16274/40003) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7151/17398) |
| 62% (335/537) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (186/327) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (100/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (62/107) |
| 58% (112/194) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (73/116) |
| 89% (341/302) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (173/149) |
| 11% (341/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (173/24) |
| 24% (245/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (158/40) |
See recent tennis photos of Zandschulp and Dancu
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
